bactrim ds generic manufacturer what is celebrex 200 mg used for men taking nolvadex finasteride or dutasteride spironolactone acne propranolol prices usa viagra cialis acheter levitra suisse levitra farmacia best price windows 7 ultimate full where to buy mountain lion mac os x dreamweaver cs5 student discount

In The News: Empty Promises

flnatcheetosThis month’s Food Product Design trade magazine shares consumer, media, and market research giant Mintel Solutions’s 2008 statistics on product development in the food industry.

Much to my initial surprise, “during 2008, ‘natural’ was the most-frequent claim on new foods and beverages.  [In the United States,] one-third [of products sported] the claim, up 16% from 2007.”

I scratched my head pondered over this factoid for a few minutes.  Why would food companies choose “natural” as a selling point?  Why not brag about Omega-3 fortification or whole grain inclusion?

Then, it hit me.

There is no legal definition for “natural.”  The Food & Drug Administration has not defined what products can — and can’t — use that term in their advertising.

Much to food companies’ liking, consumers associate “natural” with healthy, low in calories, and nutritious.  While that is certainly true if you’re talking about pears or tomatoes, it doesn’t apply to other “100% natural” products like high fructose corn syrup, 7Up, and Cheetos white cheddar puffs.

This phenomenon is not contained within the 50 states.  “On a global scale, ‘natural’ claims appeared on almost one in four (23%) new products.”



  1. Meredith said on April 29th, 2009

    Andy, on the new website your RSS feed is only showing the first few sentences of each article. Could you change it back to the original settings, where we could read the whole article via a reader?

    Thank you! The new site looks great.

  2. Andy Bellatti said on April 30th, 2009

    Hi Meredith,

    Thank you. I have alerted my web team. They are looking into it.

Leave a Reply