• buy adobe flash professional cs4 buy adobe creative suite 3 production premium buy windows 7 ultimate cheap buy acrobat 8 standard price of autocad electrical cost of windows xp sp2 buy microsoft outlook 2007 uk windows home server 2011 cheap best price corel draw buy matlab r2010a buy adobe photoshop elements 7 old version cheap aperture 2 price of corel draw cheap adobe master collection cs4 rosetta stone university discount
  • windows 7 ultimate purchase purchase adobe acrobat 9 standard buy photoshop cs5 extended order microsoft project 2003 cubase 5 buy online adobe photoshop cs3 price buy windows seven adelaide how much does lightroom cost buy windows 7 family pack uk buy sony vegas 7.0 download office 2007 basic oem cheapest autoroute buy guitar pro 5 for mac buy acronis disk director server 10.0 buying publisher online

    Personalized Nonsense

    DNA_human_ancestry_AfricaOn an almost weekly basis I receive e-mails from companies offering “personalized multivitamin kits.”

    The pitch goes something like this: fork over a three-digit figure (I’ve seen ranges from $150 – $400) to receive a special cotton swab in the mail.  You are to scrape the inside of your cheek with this swab and return it via postal mail (in a special container, of course)

    A few weeks (and more dollars) later, your custom-made multivitamin mix tailored to your genetic profile arrives.

    Wow — so futuristic!  And, come on, who doesn’t love a personalized service?

    Too bad it’s not quite as scientifically edgy as it sounds.

    Although the field of nutrigenomics (nutrition as it pertains to our individual genetic code) is in the beginning stages (think building the first floor of a 300-story building) and holds plenty of promise, the science is not yet at the point where it can make specific nutrient recommendations based on a genome.

    Many of these companies claim that nutrition guidelines are useless since they are meant to apply to 98 percent of the population.

    Remember, though, that recommended intake figures for vitamins and minerals are meant precisely as that — guidelines.

    It is expected that certain populations, or people with certain conditions, will alter their intake somewhat from them.  For example:

    • Menstruating women require more iron than non-menstruating women
    • Smokers have higher vitamin C requirements than non-smokers
    • Teenagers require higher calcium intakes than adults over the age of 65
    • Women who breastfeed need more vitamin B6 than a man in his thirties

    Remember, too, that in the case of most vitamins and minerals, most adults are already getting plenty — partially because most adults are getting many more calories than they need.

    There are a handful of vitamins and minerals that are under-consumed in the United States (mainly iron, calcium, and potassium), but most people’s intake of the B vitamins and zinc, for instance, are well-above the recommendations.

    Even if we could tell someone that they need, say, 20 extra milligrams of vitamin C a day, the goal would be to get that nutrient from food (ie: eat an extra half orange), rather than costly supplements.

    A few years back, the Goverment Accountability Office released a wonderful report on the accuracy and efficacy of these “at home” genetic tests.  I highly recommend leafing through it.

    Click here for a brief summary of the paper, and here to read highlights from it.

    In the meantime, don’t let fancy shmancy futuristic advertising pry open your wallet.

    Share

    Leave a Reply

    Trackbacks